Software development projects are notorious for going over-budget. As you kick off yours, pay close attention to the type of contract you set up.
Often project success hinges on choosing the pricing model that meets your needs. Without it, your business may face a bloated budget, endless scope creep or a flawed product.
Typically, there are two main models: time and material vs. fixed price contracts. Let’s analyze the risks and opportunities of both these models. This way, you can better control your outsourcing costs while achieving your product vision.
A fixed price contract involves a flat fee to complete a well-defined project. In this model, it’s common to spend lots of time upfront clarifying the scope. The project is usually small and straightforward. For this reason, your participation isn’t typically required during the development process.
Unlike time and material contracts, you will only pay once the final product is ready. Overall, you must be certain about your project vision from the start. Any changes or additions will incur higher costs and delays.
Deciding between fixed price model vs. time and material contracts can be difficult. Here are some best use cases for fixed price projects:
In these cases, you may benefit from selecting a fixed price contract for your product.
Of course, fixed fees aren’t advantageous in every scenario. There are serious risks to know before opting for a fixed price model vs. time and material contract.
Time and materials (T&M) pricing takes a different approach. You'll be charged by hours worked on your project (i.e. time). You'll also be responsible for the cost of tools and equipment (i.e. materials).
In the contract, you’ll define the hourly rates and the full list of materials required for the project. From here, you’ll pay as you go for work completed. Since you’re charged by the hour, you’ll have the full flexibility to update your project scope over time.
The time and materials model is ideal for larger projects with multiple phases. You can revise requirements, make additions and prioritize features as you go along. In a time and material contract vs. fixed price, you’ll also have space to make any needed improvements.
Given the complex nature of these projects, you’ll be consulted often. It's common for businesses to provide feedback and clarify priorities throughout development.
The T&M pricing strategy is often the industry standard for building a complex product. When choosing time and material vs. fixed price contracts, keep in mind these best use cases.
As you can see, time and materials pricing is well-suited to projects that may evolve over time.
Understanding the pros and cons of time and material vs. fixed price contracts is key. Let’s take a closer look at the reasons why you should (or shouldn’t) opt for T&M.
Fixed Price
Type of Project
Small size, such as an MVP
Scope
Clear vision and known requirements
Flexibility
Rigid, with no changes or pivots to the project
Quality
No in-house control over quality
Oversight
Minimal management, with control handed off to provider
Speed & Duration
Slow to kick-off due to contract negotiations; duration may vary
Cost Savings
Flat fee offers security, but perhaps not savings if you expand the project scope
Risks
Time and Materials
Type of Project
Any size, though best for long-term and large projects
Scope
Dynamic, complex project requirements
Flexibility
100% flexibility to make changes and update priorities
Quality
Full control over quality through review and feedback
Oversight
Highly involved management, with regular meetings and feedback
Speed & Duration
Fast to kick-off; duration may vary if phases are added
Cost Savings
Risks
Time and material vs. fixed price contracts have unique focuses and benefits. As you select a pricing model, get to know these two models with our in-depth comparison analysis.
Both pricing models offer advantages, depending on your project scope. If you’re still choosing between a time and material contract vs. fixed price, bear in mind these key areas.
If you require flexibility to make changes and additions, T&M is your best bet. You’ll have full range to update your scope and set priorities for your project. In contrast, fixed price is very rigid, with little room to pivot.
For control over your project quality, choose T&M. You’ll have the opportunity to review and make changes. Fixed price puts quality in the hands of your provider, so there’s some risk involved.
If you're keen to oversee the project and ensure on-track progress, budget and product quality, T&M is the way to go. This way, you’ll be highly involved in the management, with regular meetings and feedback. Fixed price gives you minimal space to control the project during development.
Duration varies widely depending on your project scope. For a fast kick-off to your project, go for a T&M contract. You can scale up phases over time, though your project can get lengthy if you keep adding features.
In comparison, fixed fees are typically slow to kick-off due to contract negotiations. Yet, time-to-market can be quick since the project is usually smaller in scope.
Cost savings are contingent on using the right pricing model for your needs. If you’re looking for a secure final cost, a fixed price contract is the best choice. However, if you expand the project scope, a flat fee contract can become bloated with extra costs.
That’s why T&M is ideal for complex projects with evolving requirements. Ultimately, you’ll save by paying for actual completed work. Budgeting is also simplified with this model, making it easy to control costs over time.
Each pricing model has its unique risks. For fixed pricing, the greatest risk is going over-budget if you need to make changes or additions. You should also keep an eye on quality, as your provider is in charge of meeting standards.
For T&M, there’s a low risk of going over-budget if requirements expand or the scope changes significantly. You’ll also need to have top project management in place to guarantee best results.
Your pricing model can make or break project success. Make the right choice by understanding time and material vs. fixed price contracts. Check out our best use cases, pros/cons and comparison analysis above to stay informed.
In addition, keep your costs in check by finding a top software outsourcing partner. At Netcorp, we provide transparent, high-caliber partnership for projects of all sizes. Reach out to our team to get an honest cost estimate for your product vision.
Paavo Pauklin is a renowned consultant and thought leader in software development outsourcing with a decade of experience. Authoring dozens of insightful blog posts and the guidebook "How to Succeed with Software Development Outsourcing," he is a frequent speaker at industry conferences. Paavo hosts two influential video podcasts: “Everybody needs developers” and “Tech explained to managers in 3 minutes.” Through his extensive training sessions with organizations such as the Finnish Association of Software Companies and Estonian IT Companies Association, he's helped numerous businesses strategize, train internal teams, and find dependable outsourcing partners. His expertise offers a reliable compass for anyone navigating the world of software outsourcing.
Download the free copy of our "Software Development Outsourcing" e-book now to learn the best strategies for succeeding in outsourcing!
Get free e-book